#APEX PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC FULL USE AND#
#APEX PROPERTY MANAGEMENT INC FREE OFFICE USE#

Apex Property Management Inc Free Office Use

No Cosigner needed Application Fee: 40 per applicant & 20 per cosigner. The free Office Use Only Application to Rent - Apex Property Management, Inc. Apex Property Management, is a Texas real estate firm, located at 465 George Bush Highway, 100, Richardson, TX 75080. Apex Property Management provides a wide-range of real estate services. Consumers continue to find value in having a real estate professional help them through the home buying and.

Be sure to use the mobile phone associated with your account. To stay informed of future power outages, sign up to receive power outage alerts from Duke Energy by texting REG to 57801.Apex Ventures, Inc is known as one of best real estate firms in the Greater Nashville Area. We have been providing property management services , real estate investments and sales in both the private and commercial sectors for over 30 years.

APEX PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. MOLLY TODD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. 2004SC8250 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Appeal No. A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. If published, the official version will appear in the bound volume of the Official Reports. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing.

Apex contends that (1) Todd was not constructively evicted (2) the security deposit report was timely and (3) the circuit court s award of attorney s fees was unreasonable. Apex seeks reversal on three grounds. The circuit court concluded that Todd was constructively evicted and that Apex failed to timely provide her with a security deposit report. 2006AP502 fees to a former tenant, Molly Todd. All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted. ♡ LUNDSTEN, P.J.1 In this landlord-tenant dispute, Apex Property Management appeals a circuit court judgment awarding damages and attorney s 1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS.

She explained that, after she had moved in, there was near-daily drug-dealing and -consumption as well as drinking both inside and out on the front porch. ♣ In December 2003, Todd wrote a letter to Apex. In September 2003, Todd informed Apex of the problems, including extremely high noise levels, fights, drug dealing and use, and underage drinking parties. Soon after moving in, Todd began experiencing problems with her downstairs neighbors, a mother and her teen-aged son, named Carol and Jeff. Background ♢ Todd rented an apartment from Apex under a one-year lease commencing August 15, 2003.

She further wrote: I would also like to call your attention to the fact that the door between the downstairs living room and my entryway still has not been replaced. She described ongoing problems with unacceptable noise levels at all hours of the day and night. ♦ In February 2004, Todd wrote to Apex again. ♥ Todd kept a detailed log of events involving her neighbors, and it shows that she again informed Apex of the problems with her neighbors in January 2004. I do not want to make any decisions about this now, but I do want you to know that the problems with my neighbors continue and that I may need to move.

Given that I do not feel safe due to their behavior in general, combined with the fact that Jeff threatened me after the last time I called the police, this door does nothing to provide me with a sense of security. 2006AP502 sufficient separation between their apartment and mine. First, the door is made of a thin veneer and does not provide 3 No. I urge Apex to take direct action on this, for several reasons. I have been told several times since then that the situation was being looked into, yet no action has been taken.

She returned to her apartment the next day, April 8, and that night a more serious incident involving Jeff occurred. In response to a disturbance downstairs. ♨ On April 7, Todd left her apartment for the night at approximately 2:00 a.m. ♧ On March 22, 2004, Todd wrote Apex to inform Apex that she would move out of the apartment on April 16. Todd concluded her letter by stating that, given the situation, she had decided to begin searching for another place to live.

Approximately one week after the April 8 incident, she returned her keys to Apex with a letter stating that she was no longer living at the apartment. Todd also obtained a temporary restraining order against Jeff on April 9 and used a police escort to move her possessions. She also stated that she considered her responsibilities under the lease terminated, and requested her security deposit. Todd explained that Jeff was arrested and she had to be escorted from the premises by police.

The circuit court concluded that Todd was constructively evicted and that Apex failed to timely provide her with a security deposit report. After a decision by a court commissioner, Todd demanded a trial de novo in the circuit court and retained counsel. 2006AP502 ♡0 Todd sued Apex pro se in small claims court for damages, including triple her security deposit. In light of the charges, Todd received none of her $625 security deposit.

Apex makes several sub-arguments in support of this contention. Discussion Constructive Eviction ♡2 Apex first contends that Todd was not constructively evicted. ♡1 We will reference additional facts as needed in our discussion below. Apex appeals the resulting judgment.

♡3 A lease such as Todd s includes an implied covenant of quiet enjoyment. 2d 324, 328, 525 N.W.2d 96 (Ct. Whether such standards are met on a given set of facts is a question of law for our de novo review.

Apex Property Management Inc Full Use And

In other words, Apex is arguing that Todd s problems with her neighbors were insufficient to form the basis for a constructive eviction. ♡4 Apex first argues that Todd was not deprived of the full use and enjoyment of the premises. 2d 540, 543, 120 N.W.2d 654 (1963)).

There was drinking, dancing, and drunkenness. Radio and victrola music was played during all hours of the night. Such adjoining apartment was used by tenants thereof for revelry by night and by day. Noises in such adjoining apartment could be plainly heard in defendant s apartment. 790 (1929).2 ♡5 In Bruckner, which also involved neighboring residential apartments, the circumstances were these: he partitions between defendant s apartment and the adjoining apartment were thin and without any deadening material.

The ongoing conditions confronting Todd were at least as severe. Based on these facts, the court in Bruckner concluded: his was a case of constructive eviction of the tenant. The defendant and his wife could get little rest or sleep. Empty liquor bottles were strewn in the halls.

See First Wisconsin, 93 Wis. 2006AP502 ♡6 Apex argues that the facts here are like those in First Wisconsin, a case in which the supreme court rejected a claim of constructive eviction. 790 (1929), for one of its sub-arguments, which we discuss below.